Tuesday, 22 March 2011

Union Terrace Gardens

Yesterday I had to pick up a huge number of new leaflets from the excellent Rocket Print in Aberdeen - I can highly recommend them to anyone needing flyers/ postcards etc. 

I popped in to the shops briefly and decided to make the most of the gorgeous weather and have lunch in the city centre's most beautiful area, Union Terrace Gardens. 

In the fifteen minutes or so that I sat there, I counted 39 other people on a Monday lunchtime using this apparently 'neglected' public park.  People were eating, chatting, reading or walking their dogs.  All the seats on the grassy area were full, as were many of the other benches.

As I have quite a few more Facebook followers since I last blogged about the dangers facing this special place, I'll go over the basics again and give a wee update on the dreadful situation.

If you don't live in Aberdeen/shire you probably don't know that this, the only green space in the city centre, is under the very serious threat of complete annihilation.  Sir Ian Wood, a local businessman in the oil industry, pledged £50 million to the city on the condition that it is used to realise his dream of this historic green space being obliterated and replaced with a city square at street level.

He has the backing of ACSEF, Aberdeen City & Shire Economic Future.  They believe that the City Square will safeguard the future of the city.  Apparently it will encourage investment in Aberdeen, with businesses flocking to relocate here.  They haven't said exactly how this will happen.  I attended a public debate at which they were repeatedly asked "HOW?" but no answer was forthcoming.

There followed the most appallingly flawed and biased public consultation by ASCEF.  This completely disregarded the existing plans for a superb contemporary arts centre which would have rejuvinated the gardens without destroying them.  This project by Peacock Visual Arts had already received full planning consent and had raised most of the money required. 

The Peacock Visual Arts plan
 Despite the public consultation's default 'yes' vote for the scheme, its leading questions and the complete lack of mention of the Peacock plan, the majority of respondants said 'NO'.  What did the council do?  They ignored this and are pushing on with their destructive plans regardless.   Peacock's plans have been completely thrown out.

Add in to the mix a whole muddle over exactly what money has been used to finance ACSEF's work on this fiasco to date, a lot of unanswered questions about exactly what will be included  in the square, a shortfall of £85 million in the budget, concerns voiced by the Royal Institute of Architects in Scotland etc etc and you can see why this has caused a real stir in the area.

To add insult to injury ASCEF have said that they are applying to the Heritage Lottery Fund to help finance the project.  It's a HERITAGE fund.  It wasn't set up to finance projects whose aim is to destroy the heritage of an area.  Victorian gardens, mature trees - let's replace them with a concrete structure, add a garden on top and call it heritage - I don't think so.  If you feel that this would be an inappropriate use of Heritage Lottery funding you can email them at Scotland@hlf.org.uk

Finally, here is the view from the bench where I ate my lunch.

It's a ruined building called the Triple Kirks - what's left of three separate churches built around one central spire.  The site is owned by Stewart Milne who have plans to turn it into an office complex.  With such an interesting, historic base with which to start, and such a unique location, this is a fantastic opportunity to build something really special. 

This is what's planned

The full plans are available on the council's website and comments are invited. http://planning.aberdeencity.gov.uk/docs/planningdocuments.asp?appnumber=110303

Of course these offices will need car parking space, which just happens to be one of the proposals for what is now the gardens.  Oh, and coincidentally Stewart Milne is a member of the ACSEF board...

It'll all be covered over with a new garden of course, which is why they have renamed it the City Garden Project.  That makes everything allright, doesn't it?


  1. What a lovely park and how fantastic being able to sit in a outdoor oasis in a busy town or city... I love seeking out the hidden greenness in the urban sprawl.
    How frustrating and upsetting to read about the plight of the Gardens. The arty usage would have been a positive move.
    What a shame...sometimes 'progress' doesn't seem fair at all.
    Hope you can make the most of the gardens while you can....

  2. That's the kind of thing that really sets my teeth on edge. How many times have the public been 'included' in the decision making process with questionnaires full of leading, weighted questions. And all because of a nod, wink and bankroll sent in the right direction.


Thanks so much for reading my blog.
I love receiving your comments :)